| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Sticky:[December] Defender Missiles - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Starrakatt wrote: We don't need more Destroyers, or in fact small ships love, we need CCP to fix T3c, BLOPS and Battleships. One does not prevent the other, what do you have against Small ships? Are you a sizeist?? Starrakatt wrote: I...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2016.11.25 16:32:17
|
2. Sticky:[December] Defender Missiles - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Larrikin wrote: Command Destroyers Command Destroyers receive at 50% role bonus to decreasing the reactivation timer on Defender Launchers. Please do not surcharge Command Destroyers with stuffs they don't need... We are having fun ...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2016.11.25 14:00:58
|
3. Sticky:Update on Shadow of the Serpent Event - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Tipa Riot wrote: Another point, having the loot free for all makes it more or less a highsec only event. The previous events encouraged lowsec and wormholes because loot stealing in highsec was risky (if you were just for the loot). Also giving...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2016.07.07 17:46:18
|
4. When MINING was FUN and Team-spirited - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Roenok Baalnorn wrote: So if you want to increase the profits of miners, start a major war where trillions of isk worth of ships are lost. Do that about once every 4-6 weeks and you will see the value of minerals start to climb. I don't th...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2016.06.08 15:15:44
|
5. Sticky:Daily Opportunities coming soon - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
T-Jay Charante wrote: It's just a game. Are you complaining about people not being nice in EVE?... You bet your sweet hoonani that I don't want you to get more stuffs while I don't if I can help it. SP included. Those other kids need to ...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2016.05.18 16:43:05
|
6. Sticky:Daily Opportunities coming soon - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Jeremiah Saken wrote: Quote: Quote: What do you mean by cumulative weekly? I think with cumulative he means that once a week you need to do 7 actions. You can either do one everyday, divide it over three days or do all seven on one day....
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2016.05.17 17:16:02
|
7. Sticky:Daily Opportunities coming soon - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
http://crossingzebras.com/dailies-in-eve-a-design-challenge/
Haven't seen a link to this article in the thread so I'm linking it. It pretty much addresses the ONE point that really bothers people, the fact that you do have to do that task EVE...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2016.05.15 22:19:01
|
8. Sticky:[March] Warp Disruptor and Scrambler Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Paul Ares wrote: RIP scram kiting. Thanks again CCP for the useless changes which further destroy frigs and faction warfare in general. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ikQlB0hapA
The clear and apparent effects of this change, on one of ...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2016.03.17 10:17:46
|
9. Apothne for CSM XI - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
So, I've been listening to your last appearance on the Jeffraider Show, and I have to see I'm really glad I voted for you. Your point about the dichotomy about PvE and PvP, and the forced separation between PvE and PvP fits, is pretty much what ...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2016.03.03 17:56:32
|
10. Sticky:[March] Warp Disruptor and Scrambler Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aaril wrote: I still say the progression should be 8250m->8650m->9000m. -Expect to lose 400m-1500m of scram range -Expect to lose 3%+ damage to gain a meager 5 CPU (the cpu on the compact damage modules should be 20 CPU) -Expect to lose 2...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2016.02.15 08:10:15
|
11. Sticky:[March] Warp Disruptor and Scrambler Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Fozzie wrote: We are keeping an especially close eye on this change, and if it proves necessary we may tighten up the range gap between T1 and T2. We need to be careful not to let the difference get so close that the compact version becom...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2016.02.14 20:54:28
|
12. Sticky:[March] Warp Disruptor and Scrambler Tiericide - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
All the tiericide changes have been fantastic, but this one... This one is going to do a lot of harm to FW space. If tiericide's goal if to create options, this one is going to fail hard! Everyone will fit the Scoped or Tech II version when ...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2016.02.12 12:44:16
|
13. Diana Olympos for CSM XI - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
You are cute Diana, I like what you are trying to do here, even though I still disagree at a fundamental level on the emphasis on culture over mechanisms, at least there is an understanding of how to kick back the game and encourage more conflicts...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2015.12.27 02:58:37
|
14. Operatiom Frostline CCP Hilarious - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
They screwed up the rewards big time on this one. Not only are the rewards bad for those who run them they are also bad for CCP. The Serpentis shirts devalue all others t-shirts in the store. Them always dropping is poorly thought out as they ...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2015.12.13 12:17:30
|
15. Half-a-Plex if join Caldari FW [IBLOB] - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
Interested in FW but still not sure if you should take the plunge? Join us in [IBLOB] and we will give you half-a-PLEX each month, for your first 3 months, to help you quickstart your FW career. We are looking for people interested in smal...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2015.11.30 17:53:23
|
16. Sticky:[December] Remote Rep Tiericide and Falloff - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Torgeir Hekard wrote: Xe'Cara'eos wrote: I'm seeing this as an indirect nerf to small gangs...... I'm seeing this as a rather direct nerf to small gangs because Le Blob doesn't care about long cycles because with 100500 logis you are alre...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2015.11.27 12:22:37
|
17. Sticky:[December] Balance Smorgasbord - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Stitch Kaneland wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: Hi folks. Thanks for the feedback so far in this thread. After going over the discussion here, we agree that the Tristan is still a little too tanky, so we're adding a reduction in structure HP to its...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2015.11.27 01:29:41
|
18. Sticky:[December] Tech Two Logistics Frigates - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Flyinghotpocket wrote: so why is the amarr one completely inferior to the gallente one in every sense? except capacitor no inquisitor pilots asked for a 5th low. they wanted a mid. the amarr navy designed a 3rd mid. not a 5th low. Amarr is ...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2015.11.27 00:28:50
|
19. Faction Warfare and Citadels: Anchoring Discussion - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
May Arethusa wrote: Quote: If we don't allow pilots to dock in Citadels in hostile space at all, then FW continues to stagnate I disagree. This would actually provide currently stationless systems with a significant degree of strategic im...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2015.11.12 04:41:22
|
20. Announcement:CSMX - SUMMIT I - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Steve Ronuken wrote: Other than potentially existing in size and class limited plex (which contain NPCs.) how is your PvP different? Did I say that FW was PvE? Nope. But in the end, PvP is PvP. It's not significantly different, once you get...
- by Dantelion Shinoni - at 2015.09.03 12:40:22
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |